Critical Issues Forum

Critical Issue: The Need for Enhanced Protection and Management of Remaining Illinois Riparian (Streamside) Woodlands and Forests
June 2005

Jean Mangun and Kristin Floress
Department of Forestry
Southern Illinois University Carbondale

What Distinguishes a Riparian Woodland? Riparian woodlands and forests are areas of woody vegetation adjacent to streams, rivers, or lakes. Riparian vegetation can form a narrow strip or can extend out several hundred yards from each side of a water body. Under natural conditions, riparian vegetation acts as a transition zone or buffer between land and water, a buffer that can filter and retain pollutants and sediment in groundwater and surface runoff.

Remnant forested riparian buffer in the Big Muddy Watershed

Remnant forested riparian buffer in the Big Muddy Watershed. Photo credit: W. Mangun

Why are Riparian Woodlands Important? Riparian woodlands and forests play important roles in maintenance of water quality, biological diversity, and streambank stabilization. By performing these functions, riparian areas help keep water fit for both human consumption and recreation. Serious environmental and economic consequences of degraded riparian vegetation are becoming increasingly evident and have become critical resource management issues in Illinois and other Midwestern states.

What is the Present Status of Illinois Riparian Forests? Agricultural, industrial, and urban expansion has resulted in the removal or reduction of much of the native vegetation that once flourished alongside Illinois streams and rivers. While few hard numbers are available on existing acreage of forested riparian areas, some of the best examples of Illinois forests, such as those of the Kaskaskia River Watershed, persist today in bottomlands and floodplains. Given the added water quality benefits of these areas, conservation of remnant riparian woodlands and forests becomes essential.

Although Illinois has over one million acres actively enrolled in Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) contracts, the majority of these acres are planted in grass. Farmers and landowners have been reluctant to incorporate trees into riparian buffer restoration plans.

“We must reinforce the need for riparian corridors, and also provide additional incentives to landowners to convert these areas back to trees.”
-Illinois citizen comment

What are Some Possible Solutions? Management of riparian woodlands and forests focuses on conserving a mix of native vegetation. Conservation efforts need to be for the long haul. As CRP contracts expire, landowners need to understand why streamside land should not be converted back to row crop production. Planting trees must be made to work economically for the farmer and landowner. Incentive program contract lengths should reflect the longer maturation time of wooded buffers.

State programs like Conservation-2000, which promotes watershed-scale, problem solving partnerships, need to be strengthened and continued. The need for more landowner education and technical assistance programs and the forestry professionals to administer them becomes evident.

Additional Reading

Lowrance, R.R., Dabney, S. & Schultz, R. (2002). Improving water and soil quality with conservation buffers. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 57, 36-43A.

Schoonover J.E., Williard, K.W.J., Zaczek, J.J., Mangun, J.C. & Carver, A.D. (2005). Nutrient attenuation in agricultural surface runoff by riparian buffer zones in southern Illinois, USA. Agroforestry Systems, 64, 169-180.

Schultz, R.C. Isenhart, T.M., Simpkins, W.W. & Coletti, J.P. (2004). Riparian forest buffers in agroecosystems–lessons learned from the Bear Creek Watershed, central Iowa, USA. Agroforestry Systems, 61, 35-50.

This is a publication of the Illinois Forestry Development Council. Additional copies can be obtained at For more information, e-mail